Lay Leadership at
(Deacon
Council “action plan” edits
I. Introduction
One of the
principal questions being addressed by the
Improving
II. Issues
Throughout
its history, one of
The process
most often used to identify leaders at
1.
The numerous and diverse activities that distinguish
2. A small group of people takes on the heaviest burden of the responsibility.
Even with the large number of participants in councils and committees, in most cases, the reality is that the chairpersons of the groups do the bulk of the group’s work in the time between meetings. Taking on the leadership position of a group is a major and often time-consuming responsibility. In most councils, committees, and mission groups, leaders are selected once the groups are assembled. In some groups, leadership capability can be readily identified and the necessary guidance enthusiastically given. In others, leadership may be accepted by default, perhaps with less creative results.
Effective leadership of every group
is essential to sustain
3. Many folks feel unprepared or lack the confidence to take on a lay leadership role.
There’s no training or preparation
in place to “groom” new leaders or educate the willing in the unique set of
skills required for church leadership. Often the people who have managerial or
leadership roles in their professions are the first to accept group leadership
roles in church, simply because they have had the experience and therefore know
they can do it. Many others who accept leadership by default are surprised to
find that they, too, have untapped leadership skills, and are effective lay
leaders. Though it’s fortunate when
4. Nominating committee has a hard job in soliciting; matching skills, interests, and gifts to positions is difficult.
Presently at
5. Some people just aren’t interested in participating beyond coming to worship.
There is a broad continuum of level
of involvement. Some people may not even be aware of all the service that goes
on “behind the scenes” to make
V. Definition and Clarification (what do we mean by
“leadership” and who’s doing it?)
We have identified three levels of participation by lay leaders, plus Sunday School teachers, and mission groups, for a total of about 400 people:
|
Mission/Interest
Groups: over 100 people |
Teachers:
80 to 85 people |
Stage
1 Leader: 130 to 140 people |
Stage
2 Leader: 79 people |
Stage
3 Leader: 11 people |
|
There
is no set number of participants for an “official” mission group or special
interest group. Many who participate here also serve in other leadership
roles as well. These groups come together through shared commitment to an
issue, cause, or mission. Nominating committee does not fill positions in
these groups; they are entirely self-selecting. |
Approximate
number of volunteers by age group: Children:
45 Youth:
13 Adult:
13 Wed.
night: 8 Most
teachers share positions, rotating by week or month so that no one has full
or ongoing responsibility for preparation and teaching. Many who teach also
participate on committees. |
Members
of committees, approximately 130 based on minimum membership per the church
bylaws. Does not include the chairs of committees and rising chairs of
Finance and Personnel counted in Stage 2. Plus
other (stand-alone positions) Asst.
Librarian Asst.
Clerk Asst.
Treasurer Trustees |
At-large
members of councils: Admin-6 Cong.
Care-6 Coord-6 Deacons-12 Education-6 Missions-6
Worship-6 Chairs
of committees and mission groups: About 28 Church
positions: Clerk, Librarian Archivist Identified
rising chairs: 2 for Personnel 2 for Finance 2 for B & G 86
total; less the 7 council chairs=79 |
Chairs
of councils: Admin Cong. Care Coordinating Deacons Education M & O Worship Chairs
of key committees: Personnel Finance B & G Church
officer: Treasurer |
The preceding table listing
leadership groups at
With the
demands and pace of 21st century life in America, church
participants often feel limited in the amount of service they can offer to the
faith community.
If we accept
that most
1. We’re at our best when we
keep “new blood” in the leadership system. The combination of the
“institutional memory” of long-time members and the new energy from those newly
acquainted with
2. Share the secret joy of advanced leadership responsibility. We need to promote the idea that deeper involvement in the church provides opportunities for deeper connections. Many who’ve reluctantly taken leadership roles were amazed to find they received far more, in terms of other spiritual and personal rewards, from the experience than they put into it; these are stories worth telling. Our experience of community is deeper when we take ownership and become involved.
3. Wouldn’t it be great to have willing and eager leaders rather than drafting them or resorting to “I’ll do it if no one else will”. This can happen if we encourage folks to “step up their game” to the next level. We need to nurture and prepare members for roles with greater responsibility and visibility, and publicize the fact that the spiritual payback for the deeper investment is well worth the sacrifice.
4. Everyone can understand how the church structure
enables the functioning of the community and can easily see where their gifts
are best asserted. Rumor has
it that some people are confused and intimidated by the church structure and
therefore reluctant to take on a leadership role. It should be easy for a new
or newly energized
In order for
1. Assemble a roster of all those who have served on each council, committee, or group during the past five years, update it yearly, and use it to identify leaders. Ideally this information would be maintained on a computer in the church, but not in the church office, so that it would be readily accessible by the Nominating Committee and others. The data should be cross-referenced and retrievable either by group (everyone who’s been on X committee) or by individual (list all groups on which X member has served). The Nominating Committee would be responsible for updating the roster each January with the new slate of volunteers for the year.
2. Develop and use a roster of individual interests and
group service outside of
3. Revise the initial information request form that is
provided to new members. Include memory-jogging or multiple-choice
questions that reveal prior volunteer experience in other churches or
non-profit organizations. Perhaps list the general functions of various
committees and councils at
4. Form an ad-hoc Information Committee to “jump start”
this data collection process. It’s possible that the capability to capture
the information above already exists in the church’s database, or could be
accessed by purchasing a report-writing add-on to the current software.
Ideally, the Microsoft Access database (external to the main software) created
for the PTTF’s survey data would be combined with the main system so that one
source serves all information needs. A couple of months of focused work by
knowledgeable people could produce a more thorough collection tool, establish
the means and methods of recording the data, and identify the optimal ways of
attaining and utilizing reports. This committee should include some
technological experts as well as some “seasoned”
|
Action Plan - Group
I. Computer Records |
|
Recommendations 1,
2, 3, and 4: These recommendations all relate to databases and online
record-keeping and should be accepted and coordinated under the temporary
leadership of |
|
We acknowledge the potential need for purchasing an
approx. $300 software package to
implement these recommendations. Also,
we request |
5. Publish a new or revised brochure highlighting each
committee, council, group, and opportunity for service. This should be an
overview-level listing of every group, including its function and
responsibilities, description of its membership criteria, term of service,
meeting schedule, etc. The headings of the document on the “about
us/committees” page of
6. Update the “Places for People at
We suggest that responsibility for the publications listed in #5 and #6 go to an ad-hoc group consisting of two members each from the Administration, Education, and Congregational Care Councils.
7. Periodically feature a committee, council, or group in
|
Action Plan - Group
II. Publications |
|
Recommendations 5,
6, and 7: These recommendations all relate to publications and
communications and should be accepted and coordinated under the temporary
leadership of #7, asking for monthly newsletter articles from councils
and committees, will actually begin in September. For example, the Deacons and Coordinating
Council will share 1 ½ pages for articles about their work, Worship and
Congregational Care the same, etc.
This returns to an earlier communication plan which produces a
newsletter within the required page limits.
( |
8. Develop and implement a “
Offered: once each year in the early fall, at the start of the Nominating Committee’s high season.
Goal: to interest Pullenites in investing their time and energy in the work of the church
Overview: a half-day gathering and invitation to service, perhaps billed also as Pullen “job fair”
Target audience: new member, not involved on a committee, interested in a new venture or exploring a different area of service, attended Pullen 101 (though not a prerequisite). Invitation to the event to be publicized widely.
Course outline:
I. General introduction to how things get done, why committees are important, personal stories of meaningful group interactions, overview of the general functional areas. Each person will choose a general area of interest and break into 2 or 3 smaller groups for part II.
II. Descriptions or presentations of several committees or councils in a related interest area, with a preview of each group’s meeting schedule, its typical activities, future plans, etc. Current members of the groups could perform skits, show pictures, answer questions, or use creative means to get people interested in joining their group.
III. Call to action-provide signups for interest and pass on to Nominating
Pullen 301
Offered: once yearly in the fall
Goal: to call leaders to “step up to the next level” and empower them to do so
Overview: a half-day training for current lay leaders who are interested in or willing to explore the possibility of increased responsibilities
Target audience: broad invitation to all current members of councils, committees, and mission groups, plus targeted invitations to chosen individuals who show leadership potential.
Course outline:
I. Refresher on how things work and why committees, councils, etc. are vital, history of significant lay leadership “success stories”, personal examples of the deeper experience of community gained by chairing/convening a group.
II. The task of leadership-what it means in church in general, at Pullen in particular, and how leadership in church culture is not the same as in business or other circumstances. Gain awareness of church polity, unique considerations and sensitivities when leading volunteers in a faith community.
III. Practical tools and skills for leading a group: decision-making models, setting agendas, running a meeting, delegating tasks, tips for distributing minutes and notices
IV. Call to action-committee members rotating off and ready for council at-large? Nominating needs to know.
A printed document that could be used as text for Pullen 301 and given as a resource to chairs of groups, this book would give a reminder of the cultural and practical tips for leaders.
II. Advisors and mentors. Develop each year a list of former group leaders who agree to be available to advise new leaders on issues of cultural and practical leadership etiquette. Parameters regarding the extent of this assistance should be clear, and should be limited to a quick phone call or email for advice on how to handle a situation or where to go to find information on a topic.
Implementation of such a training program would be a cross-functional endeavor that impacts the entire church structure at every level, and is not an obvious fit for one particular group to take ownership. We suggest that the planning, curriculum development, advertisement, and execution of these three sessions be handled by some combination of all or part of the Coordinating Council, Administrative Council, and the Nominating Committee, with staff support from the Minister of Outreach and Adult Education. Members of other councils and committees would need to participate in the actual events as spokespersons for their groups and to share personal leadership stories.
9. Encourage the 10 key groups to identify their next year or two years’ leadership early. The naming of a “vice-chair” or similar term that designates the person who will assume leadership is critical to the effective transition of a group from one year to the next. The vice-chair should use their year in that position as a mentoring opportunity, observing closely how the chair directs the activities and deliberations of the group.
10. Give groups the explicit freedom to structure their leadership and call forth their leaders in ways they find suitable. Although at Pullen we have historically used the term “chair” to refer to the leader of a group, other designations such as “convener”, “president”, or “moderator” have been used, and in some cases seem more appropriate. Some groups at Pullen have moved to a shared leadership model with multiple leaders dividing the roles and tasks according to their gifts. Groups may find that securing leadership is easier if the title of the position is perceived as less threatening and the burden is shared with one or more other leaders. Simply making groups aware that alternative leadership models are possible and acceptable could open them to creative ways of achieving their goals.
11. Offer a seminar or discussion series that looks at lay leadership/staff leadership issues. Possible topics to explore include: the balance of lay/staff leadership and the goal of personal balance within the roles of lay and staff leaders. Identify the current and historical realities at Pullen, as well as considering in general how these issues play out in churches.
|
Action Plan - Group
III. Leadership Training |
|
Recommendations #8, 9, 10 and 11: These recommendations relate to identification, naming and training of leaders at various levels. The Deacons suggest that Jack Lemons, now responsible for Leadership Day, be the temporary leader of a team to work with Cathy Tamsberg and Nancy Petty as staff on planning the proposed Leadership Institute. We add to the Task Force’s recommendations one additional suggestion, item 11, and ask that the team consider the best venue for this topic-- be that inclusion in the curriculum of the Leadership Institute, or promotion as a separate event. We suggest that Patsy Govert, on behalf of Coordinating Council, add to her communications with each council (see #7 and Group I.) a copy of recommendations #9 and #10, especially requesting the naming of a vice-chair in preparation for 2004 leadership. |